An Epic Historical Fantasy?
The preface tells us this story is based on the history of the British Isles, particularly the tale of a princess and the fall of her kingdom. Though the images and artwork are nice, they break the flow of the narrative. And the narrative itself is stiff and detached like it's the text of a history book and not one of a story, especially with all those footnotes!
Also, mentioned is the Council of Nicea which is the origin of the Trinity, but before that Christians believed in one God (and that Jesus--peace upon him--wasn't God), yet this story seems to be dismissing it and leaning toward Trinity? And wouldn't calling a beautiful woman a "goddess" be considered blasphemous if they're Christians? There is other 21st-century jargon that doesn't quite fit in the context of the story. Unfortunately, I was expecting a story closely following this princess of Selgovae, but this isn't it.
The cover artwork is nice, but the font is terrible. It's difficult to read. Also, some of the art in this excerpt seems like it's AI, which is unethical and should be disclosed if it is because plagiarism is wrong and so is profiting off of others' works.
Also, mentioned is the Council of Nicea which is the origin of the Trinity, but before that Christians believed in one God (and that Jesus--peace upon him--wasn't God), yet this story seems to be dismissing it and leaning toward Trinity? And wouldn't calling a beautiful woman a "goddess" be considered blasphemous if they're Christians? There is other 21st-century jargon that doesn't quite fit in the context of the story. Unfortunately, I was expecting a story closely following this princess of Selgovae, but this isn't it.
The cover artwork is nice, but the font is terrible. It's difficult to read. Also, some of the art in this excerpt seems like it's AI, which is unethical and should be disclosed if it is because plagiarism is wrong and so is profiting off of others' works.