Well, as a person who is quite familiar with George Romeo's work I can tell that he certainly had a hand in this. Like other people, I can't tell where his writing and Daniel Kraus' ends and begins. I believe they are merged.
Anyway. With this book, it was odd. The details that the author(s) fixed on is odd. It was like, why does this matter? Why do we need to know this? It bothered me a lot during reading the book.
The gore was perfect - well done. The only problem is that the characters that these gore moments seemed to happen to - you didn't care about them. You get a couple chapters that focus on a certain set of people and then you move onto the next. You don't get a 'title' heading the chapters to let you know whose narrative you're still in.
All in all, I thought I was a fan of Romeo... but I guess I'm not that big of a fan to care.
Anyway. With this book, it was odd. The details that the author(s) fixed on is odd. It was like, why does this matter? Why do we need to know this? It bothered me a lot during reading the book.
The gore was perfect - well done. The only problem is that the characters that these gore moments seemed to happen to - you didn't care about them. You get a couple chapters that focus on a certain set of people and then you move onto the next. You don't get a 'title' heading the chapters to let you know whose narrative you're still in.
All in all, I thought I was a fan of Romeo... but I guess I'm not that big of a fan to care.